ISO 21434: Beyond Compliance
September 8, 2025

Key Takeaways:
- ISO 21434 provides a crucial cybersecurity baseline for automotive systems, but it's not a guarantee against all threats.
- Fuzzing and hardware awareness are essential strategies to enhance cybersecurity beyond the minimum requirements of ISO 21434.
- Ignoring advanced cybersecurity measures can lead to significant financial and reputational damage.
The automotive industry faces an increasingly complex cybersecurity landscape. While achieving ISO 21434 compliance is a vital step, it's crucial to recognize that compliance alone doesn't guarantee complete protection. To truly secure vehicles against evolving threats, organizations must go beyond the baseline and implement proactive, advanced security measures. Fuzzing and hardware awareness are two essential strategies.
TrustInSoft empowers developers to eliminate runtime errors and ensure memory-safe software using mathematically proven formal verification tools, exceeding standard compliance.
The Rise of Software-Defined Vehicles (SDVs)
The automotive industry is undergoing a significant transformation with the emergence of Software-Defined Vehicles (SDVs). In SDVs, software plays a central role in controlling vehicle functions, enabling new features, and enhancing the driving experience. This shift introduces both opportunities and challenges from a cybersecurity perspective.
SDVs rely heavily on complex software systems, including operating systems, middleware, and application software. These systems are interconnected and communicate with each other, creating a large and complex attack surface. As a result, SDVs are vulnerable to a wide range of cyberattacks, including:
- Remote code execution: Attackers could remotely execute malicious code on the vehicle's systems, gaining control of critical functions.
- Data theft: Sensitive data, such as vehicle location, driver behavior, and personal information, could be stolen by attackers.
- Denial of service: Attackers could disrupt the vehicle's operation, rendering it unusable or unsafe.
Securing SDVs requires a comprehensive approach that addresses both software and hardware vulnerabilities. Fuzzing and hardware awareness are essential strategies for identifying and mitigating these vulnerabilities, ensuring the safety and security of SDVs.
Understanding ISO 21434 and Its Limitations
ISO 21434 establishes a framework for integrating cybersecurity throughout the vehicle lifecycle, from initial design to decommissioning. It outlines key requirements and objectives focused on risk management and security assurance. The standard emphasizes a holistic approach, encompassing organizational processes, security policies, and technical measures.
That said, ISO 21434 has limitations. While providing a valuable framework, it doesn't guarantee complete immunity from cyberattacks. The cybersecurity landscape is constantly evolving, with new threats emerging regularly. Relying solely on ISO 21434 compliance can create a false sense of security. Automotive OEMs and suppliers must implement proactive and advanced security measures that go beyond the standard's baseline to address emerging threats.
The Power of Fuzzing in Cybersecurity
Fuzzing is a dynamic testing technique that involves providing malformed or unexpected inputs to a system to uncover vulnerabilities. By bombarding a system with a wide range of inputs, fuzzing helps identify software weaknesses and vulnerabilities that could be exploited by attackers, as suggested by ISO/SAE 21434. Consider it stress-testing code to its breaking point.
Various fuzzing techniques exist, including:
- Mutation-based fuzzing: Modifying existing inputs to create new, potentially malicious inputs.
- Generation-based fuzzing: Creating inputs from scratch based on the system's expected input format.
- Coverage-guided fuzzing: Using code coverage information to guide the fuzzing process and explore different code paths.
ISO/SAE 21434 mandates incorporating dynamic software testing, like fuzzing, early in the product development lifecycle. This proactive approach helps identify and address vulnerabilities before they can be exploited in the real world.
TrustInSoft's formal verification tools perfectly complement fuzzing. While fuzzing uncovers potential weaknesses through dynamic testing, TrustInSoft provides mathematical proof of the absence of critical software bugs and undefined behaviors, significantly reducing the attack surface.
Learn more in our white paper: ISO/SAE 21434 from a Software Development Perspective.
Hardware Awareness: A Critical Dimension
Modern automotive systems are increasingly complex, relying on sophisticated hardware components. To achieve comprehensive security, it's crucial to consider hardware vulnerabilities in addition to traditional software flaws. TrustInSoft Analyzer has the unique ability to simulate the final hardware for precise analysis.
Hardware-aware fuzzing takes into account the specific characteristics and vulnerabilities of the underlying hardware. This approach can uncover vulnerabilities that traditional fuzzing methods might miss, such as those related to memory corruption or side-channel attacks. Potential hardware-related attack vectors include:
- Side-channel attacks: Exploiting information leaked through power consumption or electromagnetic radiation.
- Fault injection: Intentionally introducing errors into the hardware to bypass security mechanisms.
- Physical tampering: Directly manipulating the hardware to gain unauthorized access or control.
Case Studies and Real-World Examples
Numerous successful fuzzing campaigns have uncovered critical vulnerabilities in automotive systems. Similarly, hardware-related security breaches have demonstrated the potential impact of these attacks. While less publicized, acoustic side-channel attacks also pose a real threat.
TrustInSoft's solutions have helped companies improve their cybersecurity posture and exceed ISO 21434 compliance. For example, our tools can identify and eliminate vulnerabilities related to memory corruption, preventing potential exploits that could compromise vehicle safety or security.
The Cost of Neglecting Advanced Cybersecurity Measures
Cybersecurity breaches in the automotive industry carry significant financial implications. The average cost of a data breach is substantial, and the potential for recalls and lawsuits is considerable. Moreover, the frequency and sophistication of cyberattacks targeting automotive systems are increasing. Neglecting advanced cybersecurity measures can lead to reputational damage, loss of customer trust, and regulatory penalties.
TrustInSoft helps reduce expensive post-release debugging and security patches by identifying and eliminating vulnerabilities early in the development process.
Future Trends in Automotive Cybersecurity
AI and machine learning are poised to play a significant role in enhancing cybersecurity defenses, enabling faster breach detection and automated threat analysis. Blockchain technology could also secure automotive systems by providing a tamper-proof audit trail of software updates. Continuous monitoring and threat intelligence are essential to stay ahead of emerging threats.
Collaboration and information sharing within the automotive industry are crucial to improving overall cybersecurity posture. By working together, OEMs, suppliers, and security researchers can create a more resilient and secure automotive ecosystem.
Achieving ultimate cybersecurity in the automotive industry requires going beyond ISO 21434 compliance. Fuzzing, hardware awareness, and sound analysis are essential strategies to protect against evolving threats. The rise of software-defined vehicles only amplifies the need for these advanced measures.
Automotive OEMs and suppliers must prioritize advanced security measures and invest in the tools and expertise needed to protect their systems from cyberattacks. Don’t just check the box—build true security.
To learn more about achieving memory-safe software, ensure compliance with security standards, and go beyond basic certification requirements, contact us today.