Chasing False Alarms While Missing Run Time Errors

Still chasing bugs that turn out to be false alarms—while real runtime errors slip through?

Static analysis is meant to help developers catch bugs early, but too often it means spending hours investigating false positives or missing critical runtime errors altogether.  

In this webinar, we share hands-on experience using exhaustive static analysis to prove the absence of runtime errors while dramatically reducing noise. We’ll also discuss how this approach can support compliance with safety and security standards. 

Key Takeaways 

• Why developers end up chasing bugs that don’t exist—and how tools create that problem 
• How exhaustive static analysis finds all runtime errors, not just likely ones 
• Practical ways to cut false positives without hiding real defects 
• Where this approach fits in everyday developer workflows 
• How mathematically proven results can help support standards and certification requirements